It's hard to find time to post when we're busy. Here's a glimpse of a recent piece of work we're quite excited about. Our form comprehension algorithms have improved in dynamically understanding a form structure as well as extracting user inputs as structured values.
We're now able to generate fairly accurate output without any special fine-tuning. There are still some hiccups, e.g. the O from Oxford interpreted as a checkbox, but the performance is already quite strong, especially in standard computer-generated forms where handwriting is less of a challenge.
|
Consider the following manual form (pay no attention to the content, it is purely illustrative).
We previously had difficulty in accurately identifying check-boxes, as well as whether these were checked or not. |
|
Updated output:
|
|
We're now able to generate fairly accurate output without any special fine-tuning. There are still some hiccups, e.g. the O from Oxford interpreted as a checkbox, but the performance is already quite strong, especially in standard computer-generated forms where handwriting is less of a challenge.